Hi tech computer music software and hardware reviews, practical hands-on tutorials, music-making
hints and tips, written by professional musicians, seasoned computer users and professional writers
|
Stay informed
with the Making Music Newsletter and
get a FREE copy of The Fast
Guide To Creating The Perfect Mix.
We hate spam as much as you do and we promise never ever to sell, rent, loan
or give away your personal information. We fully conform to the USA CAN-SPAM rules. Here's
our privacy policy.
|
We explain what each product is, what it does, how it works, what the system requirements are, how
it performs in use, and sum up our findings in fast summary charts.
The reviews are divided into Software and Hardware - see a full list on the Site Map.
How we score
In truth, very little music software released by the major music software developers is poor and a lot of it is
cracking good gear. The main questions most users need to ask are: how well does it do what it says on the tin, how
easy is it to use, how much does it cost (unless you're starting your third World Tour), and does it do what I
need?
We can help with the first three - only you can decide if it does what you want - but, inevitably, they are all
intertwined. If a product only does a couple of the things you need but it's cheap, it could be a worthwhile buy
just to get a couple of features.
A problem many people have with much music software is that it's often seen to be expensive. However, music
software is among the most complex and demanding to create and much of it is quite specialised with a relatively
small market. Compared to the price to mass market software, music software is generally not unreasonably priced.
But if we think it is, we'll say so.
Ease-of-use is another major factor. It's probably taken you a few weeks to master your main music production
software so you don't want to spend any longer than necessary getting to grips with a new program. After you've
played with a few bits of software for a while, you get a feel for it and you have an expectation that other
software of a similar kind will work in a similar way.
For example, Windows' Open and Save File dialog boxes are familiar to all computer users (okay, except Mac users
but the Mac also has its standard dialog boxes, too) and the standard system of menus - File, Edit, View and so on
- along the top of an application window is also familiar. Some software has its own file handling dialogs and its
own menu system. If this offers major benefits over the normal layout with regard to the program and if it's easy
to understand then we accept it's been done for good reason.
But sometimes software has non-standard features with no advantages in which case we may refer to the
non-standard or idiosyncratic interface. This doesn't mean that the software is not good, just that the learning
curve may be a little longer and without major benefit for the user.
Our scoring system brings together all these aspects of the product for easy and fast reference but you will
want to read the main text, too.
|